ooooh, new Metro article where Damien discusses both Suspects and Ripper street. New things I noted:
So how do you see Jack Weston? Are you the kind of actor who invents a back-story for his character, even if it’s not on screen? He’s London Irish. He’s come from a long line of police officers, it’s in the family. He’s very certain about what’s right and wrong and he’s enormously dedicated – he’s conscientious to a high degree. And he’s determined to achieve results no matter what the cost. I decided that as a DC he was on the Flying Squad but to get promoted he’s moved to east London and I think he misses the adrenalin and the rush of the Flying Squad.
So that’s a yes then? [laughs] I guess so. I get pretty much into the characters I play. Though can I say I didn’t pick the pink shirt Jack wears in the first episode. I should have had a word about that.
Were you surprised that Ripper Street was axed? The decision caused a lot of anger among fans. Yes I was, from a selfish point of view, because I had such fun doing it, filming over a summer in Dublin. And the last series ended in such a gripping way, the boxing scene with Matthew Macfadyen’s character screaming: ‘Kill him!’ It was really powerful. I think there were a lot of possibilities still open to the characters, including my own.
Do you get recognised by fans of Being Human – that show had a lot of dedicated followers? Sometimes but not as much as you’d think. Both Being Human and Ripper Street attracted a really strong and enthusiastic response and it’s inspiring to be part of something like that. But I don’t get bothered much – maybe because when I’m on the Tube, I’m the bloke sitting muttering to himself trying to learn lines and I look a bit crazy. And I’ve got a beard now, it took ten weeks to grow, so I don’t look a bit like Hal.
So, Flying Squad! (I had to look that up) Used to the sprinting and adrenaline rush, eh So I wonder when this interview was done, during press day? Because he says there were possibilities open to his character in RS... It's really strange those tweets that one day, then they got all hush hush. I wonder if he got the emails as some others did and what's really going on with it... It's good he's not bothered much on the Tube and such, but I doubt he's not recognizable. And it's not pink Damien. It's the purple shirt of sex. AHEM.
__________________
papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser A lilt in his voice. Every sentence like music... #kisskisskiss A terrible beauty is born. Love me some #Jacksass
What do we think Suspects is as a genre? drama? documentary? something else?
When I wrote the episode 2 review, I was going to use 'dramentary' but was not sure if that existed as a proper word, or if people would get what i meant, So I opted for mockumentary, which fifi has just mentioned is actually something entirely different.
I see it as drama, new and original and maybe not done before but still drama.
Because...
Iis a created and written piece of fiction brought to the screen.
As Fay RIpley pointed out in her interview here the actors know the outcome of each case and have a detailed storyline to follow and all imrpov is discussed before hand. When I learned this fact, this differentiated it, for me, from a documentary or any kind of reality show where they are discovering things in real time or making it ALL up as they go along. in my view this makes it as much drama as anything else, but it is new and innovative in the way it is filmed and created.
The creation of this drama however, innvolves not only the writer and director and actors portraying their lines, but the actors themselves become the co creators as they interpret their character that one stage further than a regular drama.
The camera work gives it that reality documentary feel, but it is not a real documentray it is created and fictional.
the camera also involves us the audience in the process more deeply... some people may find it jarring to reminded that we are the watchers and less invisible than we are when wathcing a slick regular drama, but i love that.. and i love that extra layer of awareness that the actors are improvising.
It is thanks to fifi that I am beginning this discussion because we were having quite a chat about this, you made some great points fifi, hope you feel given to share them again here
What do you guys think?
It is thanks to fifi that I am beginning this discussion because we were having quite a chat about this, you made some great points fifi, hope you feel given to share them again here
I agree domino.....it is a drama - for all of the reasons which you have given. Although part of me wants to believe that it should have a script to be a true drama - it has been 'written', if not scripted.....and the characters are portrayed by actors....to dramatic effect! As a sub genre it is completely new, though....
Glofigs - my understanding is that a docudrama is a dramatic reconstruction of real life events...which Suspects isn't.
So if a docudrama is a documenary in the style of a drama.....then a drama in the style of a documentary should absolutely be called a dramentary! Or maybe it's a fly on the wall drama? I dunno! I would really like to say I don't feel the need to catagorise it.....!!
The newness of this as a (sub)genre means that it not only had to be concieved/produced in a different way, but I think it requires a different headspace for the viewer too.
There has been some discussion about continuity errors in ep 2....but personally I think that totally adds to the authenticity of the documentary aspect. A real documentary would produce hours and hours of footage...which would then be edited to cut out anything inappropriate, or irrelevant, or just plain boring, in order to present the 'story' in a comprehendable and engaging package. If one of the protagonists chucks away a coffee cup or puts down the phone in a moment which has been cut, then those type of 'continuity errors' will be in the final edit - there would be no opportunity to re-shoot - unlike in a 'traditional' drama.
I must admit, however, that I do have a couple of issues with the camera work! I don't mind the shakey, or round the corner stuff and agree that it makes it feel a less passive viewing experience - especially combined with Damien's 'bingo' moment...I hope there is more acknowledgement of the camera/audience in future eps! But, although I can understand that a camera operator might not be allowed in an interview room, there would be no reason to film through the window with a hand-held camera, if it's already being filmed on static cameras in the room. I'm also not sure about the hand held camera angle changing mid sentence (as with the 'sharking' scene) - would there be more than one camera filming this sort of documentary.....wouldn't any more get in the way?
But I appear to have rambled off into a completely different topic now......
Domino, I would go with dramentary or dramamentary. I was looking up definitions the other day and trying to find one that best fits this show. I wasn't able to find one that fit. I think a new word is definately in order.
fifi wrote:
I must admit, however, that I do have a couple of issues with the camera work! I don't mind the shakey, or round the corner stuff and agree that it makes it feel a less passive viewing experience - especially combined with Damien's 'bingo' moment...I hope there is more acknowledgement of the camera/audience in future eps! But, although I can understand that a camera operator might not be allowed in an interview room, there would be no reason to film through the window with a hand-held camera, if it's already being filmed on static cameras in the room. I'm also not sure about the hand held camera angle changing mid sentence (as with the 'sharking' scene) - would there be more than one camera filming this sort of documentary.....wouldn't any more get in the way?
I'm glad someone else here agrees with me on this. Thank you for stating your issues with it better than I have managed to. I don't have an issue with the documentary style camerawork. I just think there are times when it's completely unnecessary and being done solely for artistic purposes, which I find distracting. Everything in the episodes happens so fast. It's very fast paced. I don't need my brain taking me out of the scenes to question camera work.
I really liked it when Jack addressed the camera. That made it feel more like a documentary to me than the filming thorough windows. I hope they do a little more of that in the future.
I'm afraid we are just going to have to make peace because it looks like they're going to stick with it.
__________________
"I should have left a clue. Like, I don't know, locking him in a cellar and tying him to a fucking radiator!"
Well I would still classify this as a drama because that really is what it is. It is not a documentary, obviously, since the characters and story lines are all made up. It is not a mocumenatry because it is not a parody of anything real. To me it is a straight drama, that just happens to have been filmed with "creative" camera techniques to give it a fly-on-the-wall feel. As for the scripted vs non-scripted, lets keep in mind that the stories were written and well defined to the actors. Each scene was storyboarded and they were given all the criteria necessary for the scene, every piece of information that it needed to contain to progress the story along. Also, I'm assuming they were given some direction into their character's reactions - ie. we want Jack to be clearly impatient, but don't blow up on the suspect this time... The main thing left to the actors was the specific words coming out of their mouths at any given time, but again much of what they needed to say they knew about ahead of time from the storyboard and their research. So to me, the fact that it's "unscripted" does not make it any less a drama nor does the fact that the filming style is different.
So I find it hard to label it as anything but a drama (that just happens to be unconventionally filmed)
As for continuity errors, that has nothing to do with this new style. Those exist in everything. Remember the magically appearing sandwich in Hal's hand after the food fight, or Flight's hair changing from messy to combed in the bar with Evelyn?
The camera peeking around doors in Ep 1 bothered me alot, mostly because it kept partially cutting out Damien, as did the light glare in the interview room. But in Ep 2 I honestly didn't note anything at all that detracted from the characters and the story. The camera crew was learning along with the actors to get comfortable with the process so it's possible they improved somewhat from the 1st episode (viewing the dailies might have had the director give them different direction) or my brain just got accustomed to it. All I know is I loved the Bingo moment when he looks at the camera, because up to that point it had been ambiguous is they were actually supposed to have a camera crew following them or if it was just the style of the drama. To me that moment solidified what Damien said in an interview about the character of Jack being aware of the camera and him trying to incorporate that in his performance. (which I feel extends to Jack "simmering" in the interview rooms at times when I think he probably would like to blow up)
Anyway, starting to ramble and I'm not really contributing anything so I shall end now.
__________________
papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser A lilt in his voice. Every sentence like music... #kisskisskiss A terrible beauty is born. Love me some #Jacksass
I found this on imDb Suspects page. In the main they think it is OK although there is always one or two who love making disparaging comments. This poster likes the show and particularly Damien! The bit in bold is good!
It's non-actorly acting, and a deliberate choice on the part of cast and crew. Personally I find it quite refreshing not to have soundtracks and overemoting telling me how I should respond to a particular scene. Damien Molony in particular has a quietly impressive presence and a way of holding the room that makes him believable in the part (if rather too good-looking in a telly way), and the supporting cast all chime together nicely. No-one feels like they're pitching a performance.
-- Edited by Pearl24 on Saturday 1st of March 2014 10:12:43 AM
I see what you mean fifi! but for me, it's not the 'writer' having ownership of the lines that makes it a drama. the actors are still creating lines, they are not lines from real life... they just become the co-creators of the drama - that co-creation element is yet an other reason why i think Suspects is brilliant - and the fact that they do so on the spot and in the moment rather than sitting and thinking about it for ages and perfecting it (altough i believe they did actually discuss it between them before shooting) doesnt make it less of a drama for me, perhaps more so.. at least more exciting as it has that unknown element and comes with an extra shot of adrenalin!
i opted for mockumentary originally because.. i know its actual definition is satire 'mock' as in to make fun. but mock also means pretend /fake. i guess that is why i used it but still think dramentary is more accurate!
Nice quote Pearl if you come across any good reviews please feel free to post them in our SUSPECTS REVIEWS topic!
As some of you may have seen from discussion in the forum chat box and another topic here and on twitter, the next episode if Suspects will either be the last for a while or the last episode of the series.
We have had this officially confirmed by Channel 5, but there will be an announcement in the next few days which will clarify if it is 'taking a break' or the last episode.
The initial comment posted on Digital Spy stated 'taking a break' with a new series of 'Castle' scheduled in the wednesday 10pm slot from 19th March, but Sky schedules today are calling next week's episode the last in the series.
Let's hope it is just a break, which in the end may not be a bad thing, scheduled back to back with Line Of Duty on BBC2 is not doing Suspects any favours, 2 hard edged cop shows in one night is a lot for anyone (although I have only watched Suspects!) so a rescheduling may be a positive!
We have also been told that the announcement will cheer us up - again not entirely sure of the meaning of that, but it does give us a little hope!
If they are going to make it the last episode I can't think anything that would cheer me up :( Except Suspects DVD including all episodes. That could help a little. But it's really not the same than waiting for new ep and seeing Damien on the screen...
No more news I am afriad, the official announcment did not come today as expected.
'Castle' is taking over the Wednesday 10 pm slot on channel 5 from 19th March, returning after a mid series break from 17th December 2013 when the last episode aired. Perhaps this will be a similar arrangement? Cannot help but feel a series loses its momentum when that happens...and the audience engagement....? but do feel the current scheduling is working against Suspects. I would imagine due to the strong language and subject matter it will remain in the 10pm slot.
I just don't understand why is this channel doing this? I mean, if they have done it before there's got to be something wrong in the system. What about the fans? They have aired only 4 ep and now they are talking some mid season brake(I mean, it's sound bit too soon)? They are showing 5 ep, then they are going to have a brake, so there must be at least 10ep?
Is this same thing like summer brake from the shows when people are watching less tv or something? Hope they are not even considering stopping the show..
And I can only hope they have decided to make another season and they want show to be fresh trough year (maybe that's the "announcement that will cheer us up"?)
Well, been waiting Damien be on screen for long time, I guess I'm little frustrated about this situation. And this is excellent show, the idea of it is fresh and new, it is so new lot of people haven't even heard of it and when they do, hope they are not hearing word "canceled"..
Fingers crossed it's only a brake! I still don't understand policy of this decision but I guess soon we will know what all this fuss is about!
First off I wasn't particularly worried about this news...it seems unlikely to me that ch5 wouldn't air something which they have paid for and it would certainly be good for it to move away from Line of Duty. But the fact that ch5 still haven't actually said anything about it is starting to bug me now. It's as if they don't believe that anybody would actually watch one of their programmes and be interested in knowing what's happening with it!!
Wonder if the drop in viewing figures make them think that stopping now and starting over again in the autumn with more promotion - now that it seems to have hit it's stride - as a 'new series' will boost the figues back up again. (possibly followed by another mini series next spring?!)
-- Edited by fifi on Tuesday 11th of March 2014 10:08:31 AM
Yes there are 10 episodes made, the press pack contains 10 episodes. This fact alone leads me to believe they will not simply be dropped, and it is indeeed just a break - however frustrating it may be to us fans because as you say fifi, Suspects is just getting into it's stride.
It seems counterintuitive to stop something midway when the momentum of the series arc is building. Yes each episode is a discrete self contained story / case AND there are no personal lives character arcs, BUT there is a growing engagement with the detectives, their personalities and approaches, their relationships to each other, all of that builds and builds each week and for me is what makes it most magnetic to watch.
Exactly! You get to know the characters better and better after every episode, little different way that usually in the series like this, there is no "quiet moment" from the investigations for talking about personal lives and happenings. You get to know them by watching them work. It's very interesting way to approach peoples lives and personality's.
Fay Ripley was on the Alan Titchmarsh show this pm (UK daytime TV show) and chatted about Suspects as well as her new cookbook.
Some lovely Suspects pics were shown including Damien, and also an edited version of an Episode 5 clip.
Watch the FULL Damien Molony Forum exclusive clip here.
There was also mention of a series 2 in the autumn, but we cannot be sure if this means a brand new (as yet unrecorded) series, or the remaining 5 episodes, that have already been filmed.
Channel 5 told me again today there will be an announcemnet soon, so I am now wondering if this will actually be an on air announcment after tomorrow's episode.
Thanks for posting this, domino. I'd wondered if they'd been provided with any kind of character profile at all - it's interesting to find that they were given entirely free reign...
You're welcome fifi Fay Ripley was on The Wright Stuff this morning too, brief chat about Suspects and the improv, and mentioned that they of course had the advice of real life police people (who often told her she "cant say that"!).
Last night on Channel 5 there were promos for tonights episode, with a voiceover calling it the last in the series.
Putting that together with what Alan Titchmarsh mentioned during Fay's interview on the show yesterday, that a new series begins in the Autumn, this seems to be the news.
No official announcement yet, but it looks as if the 10 eps are being spilt to make 2 series - Suspects Series 1 ending tonight and Suspects Series 2 beginning in Autumn.
The downside of this news is we don't have another 5 weeks to go of DaMo and this exciting drama on our tv. BUT the upside is we know we definitely will be having more later in the year!
I remember when a season was 20+ episodes. These 5 and 3 episode seasons are rediculous. At least we will get to see the other 5 eventually....I guess. Who really knows anymore?
Hopefully they will use this time wisely and promote, promote, promote.
-- Edited by Random Jane on Wednesday 12th of March 2014 03:44:12 PM
__________________
"I should have left a clue. Like, I don't know, locking him in a cellar and tying him to a fucking radiator!"
I would not be in the least bit surprised if the ten episodes have indeed been broken up into two segments. I also believe that had Suspects got better ratings than it did then channel five would capitalise on this and have shown all ten in one go. Me, cynical? whatever gave you that impression?
I've said this before but channel five have form for this kind of behaviour. The only shows that they seem to show in one continuous run are their old favourites, NCIS, CSI. Everything else gets yanked around like a puppet with its strings cut. How one earth are they supposed to garner any kind of respect from other channels, from viewers of their channel and prospective viewers if they continue to do this? People get invested in shows and it is annoying that this damned channel does this because while the viewers love the show now it doesn't mean that they will automatically return once they deign to put the show back on the air. Castle is back after a three month hiatus, part two of series 2 of Person of Interest is back at the end of March after a similar break. Apart from Suspects, what have they shown in their places? shockumentary 'I Have Three Heads' type rubbish that is basically third rate gawp-tv, or failing that, repeats of other shows....repeats!! I know all the channels show repeats but if they want viewer loyalty and continuing loyalty they need to show a little of the same to us the viewers.
My bet is part two will air late summer when the schedules are reasonably quiet but cynically i'm thinking by then, a few may not bother, the momentum has gone.
Channel five are bleeding idiots and i will not refrain from telling them so. Not that they will listen.
-- Edited by rubyrosettared on Wednesday 12th of March 2014 07:45:15 PM