Welcome to DMF!
To join the discussion & for more content, log in or register here!


Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: THE HARD PROBLEM - SPIKE QUESTIONNAIRE

Post Info
Damiac
Status: Offline
Posts: 3581
Date:
RE: THE HARD PROBLEM - SPIKE QUESTIONNAIRE
Permalink  
 

littleimpulse - sadly NTlive productions aren't released on dvd......bur oh how I wish they were!



__________________

".....he'll be with you while you dream"

Professional Thud-er
Status: Offline
Posts: 3589
Date:
Permalink  
 

littleimpulse, the NTLive plays are on DVD, you just have to go to the NTArchive to view them!  I'd found out about it existing last year, and Jozie actually went last time she was in London, to watch Traveling Light!  You just have to make an appointment but otherwise it sounds easy and they are very accomodating.  The Hard Problem should be there now too.  This thread has all the info:

http://www.damienmolonyforum.com/t48732708/who-has-seen-travelling-light/?page=1#comment-60170118



__________________

papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser
A lilt in his voice.  Every sentence like music...
#kisskisskiss 
A terrible beauty is born.
Love me some #Jacksass

Professional Thud-er
Status: Offline
Posts: 3589
Date:
Permalink  
 

Been thinking about  the comments on lack of drama, and the criticism about finding it hard to empathize with any of the characters and I think I've figured out what my overall problem with the story and Hilary is. Throughout the play she spends almost every second of the time arguing with everyone about something that she supposedly passionately believes in, but from the performance I don't actually FEEL her passion, don't feel the the conviction.  It always sounds calculating and clinical.  Perhaps that's necessary in order to relate to the scientists and skeptics, but her belief in God stems from her overwhelming need to know her daughter, her overall goal through most of the play is to pray in hopes of someday finding out what happened to Cathy, and then once she finds her - nothing!  We see her frantically searching the papers and making the discovery.  This is such a monumental moment, what should be the climax of the play, but it cuts to the next scene where all we get is that she wrote Krohl a letter, and quit her job.  And she doesn't even tell her daughter.  There's no emotion.  You'd expect some sort of reunion, tears, hugs, or something.  But Hilary is just as calculating and clinical about her daughter as she is in all her arguments. THAT is what I found lacking. 



__________________

papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser
A lilt in his voice.  Every sentence like music...
#kisskisskiss 
A terrible beauty is born.
Love me some #Jacksass

Team DaMo
Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  
 
whimsyfox wrote:

littleimpulse, the NTLive plays are on DVD, you just have to go to the NTArchive to view them!  I'd found out about it existing last year, and Jozie actually went last time she was in London, to watch Traveling Light!  You just have to make an appointment but otherwise it sounds easy and they are very accomodating.  The Hard Problem should be there now too.  This thread has all the info:

http://www.damienmolonyforum.com/t48732708/who-has-seen-travelling-light/?page=1#comment-60170118


Oh, I've actually been to the V&A archives to see Ben Whishaw's Hamlet, but the National Theatre has one too?  I suppose it makes sense that it would, but I certainly never knew!  I read Jozie's report and it sounds like there is other stuff there also, not only recordings of plays?  I must remember this for the future.  I'd love to see Travelling Light.  Of course, any play on film isn't the same as the live experience of a play, but it is still great to be able to see plays you were unable to experience live!  Thank you so much for sharing this information!  I'd actually never been to the National Theatre until April this year, but I've seen a few plays now and hope to visit more often if possible.  'Tis a wonderful place!

I think, to sum up, the problem with the play for me is that it was written around intellectual issues, not to create an emotional response to the characters and so it doesn't do that WHAM into you that the best drama is capable of.  But, this said, in fact I really did enjoy the play very much indeed.  I think the play's ideas are enough, especially when coupled with a nice dose of wit to keep you entertained as well as thinking... and with BACH! biggrin  Which in seriousness gave that extra special otherness to it for me - you know: when a piece of art is able to convey a truth to you without having to actually put it into words aww.  That's what the Bach and pretty lights added for me..  But of course, it could have been more in other ways too and thus more powerful.  It didn't make me feel much and I would love to see Damien on stage in a bit more GRRR of a role (by which I mean a character he could really go at and give to.)  But I enjoyed it very much as it was!  aww

This probably isn't the place to ask, but thinking on such, for those of you who have seen Damien in more or even all of his plays, which have you liked best/which did you think was best?  Got me curious.  Getting off the topic of this particular play though so I'll stop there!



__________________
DMF
Status: Offline
Posts: 16398
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am aware this is taking the topic off at a tangent, but it seems to be where we've discussed the use of Bach the most (apart from the trailer topic) and I just stumbled across this!

Of course it was Bach.

Even at the time of his death, Bach’s music was held up as a defense against the threat of philosophical Materialism, especially in response to the provocations of Julien Offray de La Mettrie’s L’homme machine of 1748. La Mettrie had fled France and been given refuge by Frederick the Great in Potsdam soon after Bach had astonished the music-loving monarch there with the powers of his extemporizing mind activating ten fingers he loaded up with as many as six contrapuntal parts.

Writing in 1754, the theologian Johann Michael Schmidt adduced themusical reflections  made by Bach on his deathbed on a chorale melody whose text describes the appearance of the subject before Gods’ throne as proof not just of the existence of the soul, but of its immortality. Although Bach’s intricate, ever-changing combination of motives had a computational logic, Schmidt argued that the effect was, like the composer’s spirit, literally transcendent. There was no more eloquent a rebuttal of increasingly popular claims that machines could be devised to write music, then perform it in a way indistinguishable from the results achieved by feeling humans.

Closer to our own time and sensibilities, Bach’s music has more often been deployed to symbolize demonic possession (cf. Captain Nemo  and the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor) or cold-blooded, sociopathic genius (cf. Hannibal Lecter’s fondness for the Goldberg Variations ).

In Hytner’s staging of The Hard Problem we get a succession of Bach’s preludes—and, by my count, a single fugue—from the Well-Tempered Clavier. As these are heard the brain above the stage blinks, computes, cogitates. The permutational demonstrations of the fugues would have seemed the more obvious choice with which to confront the play’s paradoxes. The fugues are, after all, more overtly “mathematical,” yet also so moving and unfathomable. But these orations take too long to unfold: this is a play, and one without intermission to boot. The story and its arguments need to move along briskly. As was said of Bach, Stoppard favors a fast tempo.

The job the music is charged with by Hytner in The Hard Problem is to bridge the scene-change and do so with a thought-provoking product of the human mind. What is needed is something short or, if not short enough, something modular that can be handily truncated.

A fugue cannot easily be chopped down to serviceable duration, a prelude can be. In the National Theatre production these splices are generally grammatical in harmonic terms, though less-so according scansion. But they are disconcerting, especially in the most well-known of the preludes, the iconic C major that begins and ends the play.

Even after given this the procrustean treatment, the preludes amaze through their sheer variety and unpredictability. The not-so-subtle alterations of them only stoke the contradictions celebrated by Stoppard in the play—as if Bach, that very human superhuman, is being fed through a machine that makes radically different “decisions” about how to move through musical time and emotion.

These abridgements were not done by a computer, however, but by a professor of music at Southampton University named Matthew Scott. He introduces himself this way on his website: “I teach Commercial Composition, which is a third-year undergraduate course. The structure of the course aims to equip the student to compose at will rather than waiting for inspiration to strike.”

This sounds rather like something a character in Stoppard’s play would say, an attempt to get composers to be me more like machines.

I almost always dislike having to listen to canned music at live theater. Oh, for the days of a full orchestra and works like Beethoven’s Egmont Overture setting the stage for Goethe’s great tragedy. Nowadays it’s a bit of blaring world music for a play about India, or some rock ‘n roll to vault us back to the 50s, or some Bach to get us thinking about the ineffability of human artistic invention, elaboration, and emotion. TheHard Problem mini-preludes were recorded by young pianist Benjamin Powell, a specialist in music of the 20th and 21st centuries. His absence from the theater provides still more fodder for the play’s quandaries, since what we hear is the ghost in the machine.

Even as automatic reproductions disfigured by the commercial composer’s surgery, Bach’s preludes miraculously prove that the blinking mechanical brain hovering above the stage coupled with all the world’s computers could and would never make such a series of discoveries of decisions.

 


source



__________________

Fan Site | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube

 

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
whimsyfox wrote:but her belief in God stems from her overwhelming need to know her daughter, her overall goal through most of the play is to pray in hopes of someday finding out what happened to Cathy, and then once she finds her - nothing!  We see her frantically searching the papers and making the discovery.  This is such a monumental moment, what should be the climax of the play, but it cuts to the next scene where all we get is that she wrote Krohl a letter, and quit her job.  And she doesn't even tell her daughter.  There's no emotion.  You'd expect some sort of reunion, tears, hugs, or something.  But Hilary is just as calculating and clinical about her daughter as she is in all her arguments. THAT is what I found lacking. 

 This really bothered me too, whimsy. As you say, so much of what Hilary believes is based on her experience of having to give up her baby,  even writing her dissertation about mother love. Yet once she finds Cathy she just walks away! I guess we're supposed to see it as altruistic - she doesn't want to disrupt Cathy's life - but it just doesn't seem convincing to me. We're supposed to believe that Hilary can be satisfied with knowing that Cathy is OK. Is anyone really that 'saintly' ? I guess we don't know what happens in the 'future' of the characters and Hilary might change her mind about not wanting to get to know Cathy. 



__________________
Team DaMo
Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks so much for sharing that domino!  An interesting read and I had no idea something had been written about the use of Bach!  (In fact this article made more sense of the light structure to me too!)  I don't think it is off topic since the article is about the play as a whole.

But I'm going to be a tad off topic, by leaving this little bit of Bach here if it's OK?



__________________
Damiac
Status: Offline
Posts: 3581
Date:
Permalink  
 
RPLovesIpswich wrote:
whimsyfox wrote:but her belief in God stems from her overwhelming need to know her daughter, her overall goal through most of the play is to pray in hopes of someday finding out what happened to Cathy, and then once she finds her - nothing!  We see her frantically searching the papers and making the discovery.  This is such a monumental moment, what should be the climax of the play, but it cuts to the next scene where all we get is that she wrote Krohl a letter, and quit her job.  And she doesn't even tell her daughter.  There's no emotion.  You'd expect some sort of reunion, tears, hugs, or something.  But Hilary is just as calculating and clinical about her daughter as she is in all her arguments. THAT is what I found lacking. 

 This really bothered me too, whimsy. As you say, so much of what Hilary believes is based on her experience of having to give up her baby,  even writing her dissertation about mother love. Yet once she finds Cathy she just walks away! I guess we're supposed to see it as altruistic - she doesn't want to disrupt Cathy's life - but it just doesn't seem convincing to me. We're supposed to believe that Hilary can be satisfied with knowing that Cathy is OK. Is anyone really that 'saintly' ? I guess we don't know what happens in the 'future' of the characters and Hilary might change her mind about not wanting to get to know Cathy. 


 Yep - i agree with this too......although - to be fair - I'm not sure Hilary ever expressed any desire to actually get to know her daughter.....just to know she was safe/happy. But it did seem odd that she was more than happy to walk away once she knew this. It didn't feel like alturism to me....it felt more like she felt free to get on with her own life......



__________________

".....he'll be with you while you dream"

Professional Thud-er
Status: Offline
Posts: 3589
Date:
Permalink  
 

She did say she felt like all those years she'd been carrying her own weather and now it was like spring...

but what I'm saying is the fact that Stoppard wrote it that way made it difficult for me to connect with Hilary.  The impetus for her beliefs and actions was this child. The resolution at the end lacked the depth of human feeling. The play felt flat. As we've all said, a play about concepts rather than characters.  I think if Cathy hadn't been a plot device, if there had been a stronger connection at the end, we would have empathised more with a couple characters. It could have been one way make this a much better piece of theatre. 

I did want to mention that all this discussion isn't a complaint. I enjoyed the play very much. The debate was interesting and the wit entertaining. And I liked Spike overall.  

Will have domino & littleimpulse shun me for this, but I did not care for the music at all. I know intellectually there are all those reasons to use those pieces, but it felt jarring and out of place. *opens up a can of worms* And the impact of the light show wasn't as strong in the NTLive recording as I suspect it was in person. I think they zoomed in too much, I knew it should have been morphing and changing as they play progressed, but sometimes they just looked like bars of static light.

To answer your question littleimpulse, I've only seen two Damo plays. (I don't think you know, I'm in America)  I saw The Body of an American last year in person 3 times, and The Hard Problem recorded twice.  Putting aside all the personal stuff surrounding my experience of watching TBOAA, and just comparing the meat of the two plays - THP was entertaining; TBOAA transportive.  It was an incredible piece of theatre and I wish it had had a bigger exposure as the production I saw. (It's been staged a few other times in the US and Wales with other actors,  but they changed it to a more traditional stage/audience configuration.) But being inside a small enclosure with only 60 other people, 2 chairs, 2 actors. Watching Damien transform into 20+ characters right before my eyes, literally an arms length away, the switching of charactets and accents interweaving seamlessly for 90 min of unceasing dialogue, the depth of despair of the two main characters, the horrors of war underpinning it all, but sprinkled with wit and compassion... I don't think even if I had gotten to see THP in person it still would not have lit a candle to TBOAAA.

 Talk about going off on tangents... 



__________________

papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser
A lilt in his voice.  Every sentence like music...
#kisskisskiss 
A terrible beauty is born.
Love me some #Jacksass

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
Totally agree about The Body of an American. An incredible production and Damien was just outstanding. I really don't think it would be the same watching it performed in a more standard way with different actors.

I enjoyed The Hard Problem for its wit and its ability to make you question. Damien's performance was wonderful, witty and engaging. But the two plays were so different, it would be hard to compare them.

__________________
Team DaMo
Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  
 

A question I ponder reading your posts: Do you think Tom Stoppard put his beliefs into Hilary rather than completely creating a separate character: Hilary?  We can never know something like this I know.  I suppose the fact that I am curious about it says good rather than bad things about the play...

Whimsyfox & RPLovesIpswich, you make me envious that I didn't see (or even know of!) The Body of an American!  But I am happy you found it so wonderful and transportative!  I'll have to peruse it's forum some time to read about it!  I did know of the play Damien did at the Royal Court and had really wanted to see that but was unable to afford to get to London at the time.  I very much enjoyed this play but in acting terms would love to see Damien on stage give a performance that'd completely floor me as I said above and while Damien was great, I didn't feel the style of this play enabled that personally.  I am sure one day it'll be so though (well, I hope!)  Impressive you came all the way from America to watch Damien on stage whimsyfox!  Whereabouts are you from?  Maybe Damien will do a play over there some day?  aww

whimsyfox wrote:

Will have domino & littleimpulse shun me for this, but I did not care for the music at all. I know intellectually there are all those reasons to use those pieces, but it felt jarring and out of place. *opens up a can of worms* And the impact of the light show wasn't as strong in the NTLive recording as I suspect it was in person. I think they zoomed in too much, I knew it should have been morphing and changing as they play progressed, but sometimes they just looked like bars of static light.

Bear in mind I haven't seen the NT Live recording so you may already know this, but the light-device only did anything when the music was playing.  It was lit up, but static and blending into the background while the play went on.  It just lit up to follow the music while the music was playing during scene changes... (since I guess that was when you were supposed to look at it rather than people and scenery in the dark moving on and off stage!  The only time I rebelled was following that "prayer" scene that was mentioned.  And also since I think it was supposed to represent the brain's response to listening to Bach's mathematically [to some degree] based music.)  

Debate is always most interesting if we disagree though so I am glad you have a different opinion and I think I did mention before that if an audience member knew nothing of Bach they'd surely not feel how I did about this.  At the same time, even if you did already know something of Bach you don't necessarily feel anything.  But personally I did and completely loved this aspect of the play and it really was the thing that took the play beyond interesting intellectual debate into something that I felt.  Maybe not the most ideal that the musical interludes provided the main feeling rather than the characters, yet still, as I said before - it expressed something beyond words for me.  aww

 

 



-- Edited by littleimpulse on Sunday 31st of May 2015 11:35:32 PM

__________________
DMF
Status: Offline
Posts: 16398
Date:
Permalink  
 
littleimpulse wrote:

A question I ponder reading your posts: Do you think Tom Stoppard put his beliefs into Hilary rather than completely creating a separate character: Hilary?  


 this is a great question! 

My feeling, especially on reading the text, is that Tom's beliefs are larger than the sum of the parts.. 



__________________

Fan Site | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube

 

DMF
Status: Offline
Posts: 16398
Date:
Permalink  
 
whimsyfox wrote:

 

Will have domino & littleimpulse shun me for this, but I did not care for the music at all. I know intellectually there are all those reasons to use those pieces, but it felt jarring and out of place. *opens up a can of worms* And the impact of the light show wasn't as strong in the NTLive recording as I suspect it was in person. I think they zoomed in too much, I knew it should have been morphing and changing as they play progressed, but sometimes they just looked like bars of static light.

 


 No shunning here whimsy! hug I love the use of Bach for its connection with the themes.. but can see how it's  not as confortable as other pieces of music. maybe because it is music of the head not heart... maybe that was the point of the choice too... who knows! would love to know!  

What i am loving about this discussion is that it shows we all had an array of different experiences. That's good art isn't it?



__________________

Fan Site | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube

 

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
I just thought that the Bach sounded beautiful and I loved the way the lighting interplayed with the music!

__________________
DMF
Status: Offline
Posts: 16398
Date:
Permalink  
 
I'd love a behind the scenes insight into both Rosie!

__________________

Fan Site | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube

 

Damiac
Status: Offline
Posts: 3581
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think you're right about the light installation, whimsy.  The shots of it at NTlive made it look all wires and cables.....and I think at times it just whited out because it was over exposed (a difficult balance to achieve in a live recording with the light and dark, I guess)  The installation itself was much less visible at the theatre (although not invisible) which enhanced the effect that the lights were responding to the music.

I rather liked it, and the Bach accompaniment (or vice versa)....and it was a good distraction during scene changes. I didn't think of it first time around, but it also seemed to quite appropriately represent the passage of time between scenes too.....

Bach was obviously a well considered choice.....and generally speaking I think it worked fine even if you weren't aware of the significance. Have to say I loved the points made in that article about the fact that the music was recorded.

I would also presume that the lights 'danced' to some mathematical computer algorithm.  Which represented neural pathways in the brain.  Irony?  To wander away from Bach and his particular signincance in relation to this play.......the fact is that all music - most especially western classical music - is based in mathematics.  I have as little understanding of maths as I do science!  But i do know that there is an inherent beauty in numbers.......the patterns produced by algorithms on my computer screen in response to music are often astoundingly beautiful. And stunning logarthmic spirals appear everywhere in nature. At this point I am resisting the urge to go off on a full blown ramble about my avatar. But I won't.

I'm not entirely sure what my point is here.......but 'art' often touchs us 'spiritually'........ and the lines between science, maths, art, nature and the immaterial are all decidedly blurred.

As are the threads in this topic!  Apologies......I do seem to have wandered a long way away from the Spike questionnaire!



__________________

".....he'll be with you while you dream"

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
As someone who knows little about classical music other than do I like how it sounds and how does it make me feel, I was responding to the music used quite instinctively. I agree fifi, the lighting was definitely more impressive seen in 'real life'. I just thought it looked beautiful regardless of any deeper, scientific or intellectual meaning! But then I'm a bit of a magpie and easily distracted by shiny things! ;)

All this talk of Bach and brainwaves has led to me listening to classical music on the radio this evening while studying rather than having the TV on in the background in the hopes that it will boost my intellectual capacities!

__________________
Professional Thud-er
Status: Offline
Posts: 3589
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like the fact that all the discussion is happening, it's fluidly evolving as we share our thoughts. 

I completely understand the significance of the use of Bach in this play, but I am very picky about classical music and I will admit Bach is not my cup of tea. 

Yes fifi exactly.  I knew the light fixture was tied to the music, expected it to be a representation of brain synapses flashing in evolving complex patterns that corresponded with the music, just the Geiss music visualization program works on the computer.  But in the NTlive recording, the light fixture very much looked like a light fixture - cables and wires and individual light bulbs.  The dance of the lights was lost most of the time.  



__________________

papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser
A lilt in his voice.  Every sentence like music...
#kisskisskiss 
A terrible beauty is born.
Love me some #Jacksass

Team DaMo
Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  
 
domino wrote:
 I love the use of Bach for its connection with the themes.. but can see how it's  not as confortable as other pieces of music. maybe because it is music of the head not heart... maybe that was the point of the choice too... 

It was the point as I saw/felt it aww.  Although not so extreme as some later composer's attempts to literally map equations into music, Bach's music wasn't written to express his own emotional world, to bare his soul... or even really as an "artist" so much.  It was architecturally (How do you spell that word? *blushes*), structurally, or sometimes specifical-number-ly (wow, I am so eloquent.. not!) constructed.  It was written, more as a job and it is more scientific than just the sense in which all music is mathematical since for example consonant chords have mathematically simple ratios and so on.  To be a musician in the era of Bach wasn't even the same thing it would come to be in later years.  If between scenes the play had played Chopin for example, it'd be no surprise you'd be moved.  The point of Bach is that this music wasn't written to move you.  Yet is it without soul?  Is it without artistic beauty?  Is it without something more?  Clearly not (to me anyway!)  In a similar way, maybe this is what the play gets at.  I side with Spike in terms of science and even if consciousness isn't totally scientifically explicable now (I can't pretend I understand it all fully!) I am pretty sure it could all be explained by science... if not by ourselves then by some imaginary non-human being who was able to view us abstractly...?  But still, would that make us mere flesh-and-blood machines?  Surely not.  I think the Bach helps the play get at some indefinable *other*... and I don't know if there truly is even such a thing... but I don't know that any human can truly not feel there is something...?

fifi, though I loved the music and light installation, your post made me imagine if they could have hooked someone up and had them listen to the pianist's Bach and properly recorded activity in the brain and had like a brain showing the response to it... but then it wouldn't have changed/danced with the music, so...

I'm not entirely sure what my point is here.......but 'art' often touchs us 'spiritually'........ and the lines between science, maths, art, nature and the immaterial are all decidedly blurred.

I love this, fifi.  And it is true.  Funny how we've come so far and understand so much now, yet long ago different disciplines such as this would have been naturally seen by people as inherently linked, before much was even understood... I don't know where I'm going with that so I'll just stop!



__________________
Team DaMo
Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know where to put anything anymore, but I thought this was apt in reference to this play... although also £129! thud(Not in the good way!!!)

Still, thought I'd share!! http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/instant-expert-consciousness-tickets-17339326392?aff=em1

Does the notion of consciousness fascinate you? Attend our one-day masterclass where six leading experts will guide you through one of today's most exciting fields of research. Your host will be acclaimed author Michael Brooks. 

Speakers:

Anil Seth, author, broadcaster and professor of cognitive and computational neuroscience at the University of Sussex. Co-director of the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Studies

Patrick Haggard, professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London

Michael Brooks, New Scientist consultant and author of bestseller 13 Things That Don't Make Sense

Plus 4 more speakers to be announced

What to expect:

Consciousness has perplexed philosophers for centuries: what is this strange mental world that seems so essential to being human? Finding an answer has proven elusive, yet in the past two decades the flourishing of neuroscience has revealed intriguing clues about its nature.

The conscious mind brings together sensations, perceptions, thoughts and memories to generate the seamless movie of a person's life. It makes everyone aware of the world around them and of their own self. How all this emerges from a kilogram of nerve cells has become arguably the greatest question facing neuroscientists.

Answers are coming thick and fast from a range of directions. Electrical signals from nerve cells, brain scans and a raft of psychological tests have given us fresh insights. So too have experiments with coma patients and people who have bizarre disorders of consciousness, such as "blindsight", in which people respond to visual stimuli that they cannot consciously see.

Behavioural science has given us a window onto the mental world of other animals too, helping us to understand what is so special about the human mind. And attempts to create conscious machines gives us new ways to test theories about the roots and mechanisms of this familiar but mysterious phenomenon.

Join our speakers on a journey through your conscious mind and prepare to have it expanded.

Topics covered will include:

- What is consciousness?

- The enigma of free will

- What can we learn when consciousness goes awry?

- What animal consciousness tells us about being human

- Will we ever build conscious machines?

Who should attend?

Anyone interested in the secrets of the brain, whatever your age or background. Whether you're a scientist, a student or simply a fascinated human being, Instant Expert: Consciousness offers the chance to learn directly from the experts in our one-day masterclass.

What’s included in your ticket:

In-depth, engaging talks from 6 leading experts on consciousness

Ask-an-expert question panel - dig deeper into a subject with our speakers

Chances to meet and quiz the speakers one-to-one, as well as host Michael Brooks

Buffet lunch, plus morning and afternoon refreshments

Exclusive New Scientist Live - Instant Expert: Consciousness certificate

Delegate pack, hand-picked New Scientist merchandise offers and exclusive magazine subscription deal

Details:

Date: Saturday 12 September 2015

Time: 10am - 5pm (doors at 9:30am)

Location: Conference Centre, The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB



__________________
Molonian
Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink  
 

Okay, I'll play. I've given some of these things some thought already.

1. What three words would you use to describe Spike?

carnal, ambitious, conflicted

2. What would Spike's theme song be?

I'll have to come back to that later.

3. Spike vs Hilary, where do you stand?

I agree with Hillary, that a supreme being is just as reasonable an explanation as happenstance. More reasonable, when you consider the enormous chain of coincidences that would have to occur for evolution to be the only force behind creation in its abundance and weirdness. I wonder, though, how much she believes and how much she simply needs it to be true.

4. The best thing about Spike is

a) His underwear

   I do love a man in black.

b) His point of view

 Not so much.

c) His wit

 This was my favorite part of him, as long as it held.

d) His attitude

 This was my least favorite part when he turned into an amoral twat.

5. The worst thing about Spike is

a) His underwear

 The fact that it was there at all was a slight disappointment.

b) His point of view

 His point of view wasn't the issue so much as his adamant refusal to consider anything else.

c) his chatting up technique

 I'm sure he's smooth as silk when he's not drunk off his ass.

d) His behaviour towards Hilary

 He was relentless in his insistence that his beliefs were the only valid ones. This is his worst feature.

6. How do you feel about Spike by the end of the play?

 I pitied him. I think Spike, at some point, privately acknowledged that evolution wasn't the definitive answer. I think he looked at the excuses buttressed by flimsy research that claimed to prove man's innate selfishness, and he saw it was false. I think he felt within himself the desire to be something different and better than the product of Darwinian development, that Hillary may have stirred the longing within him to see himself as something more than a mass of cells and a bunch of synapses. I think he felt the pull of that unquantifiable part of himself, and he chose to deny it. He chose to stand by the belief that defined his profession, that paid for his rent and booze and condoms. He chose carnal man over spiritual man, and he devolved as a human being because of it. 

7. Rank Spike's likeability on a scale of 1 - 10

(1 being 'I don't like him at all', 10 being 'I love everything about him')

I liked him about a 6 to 7 at the beginning. By the end I just wanted to take him to intellectual detox and get the poison out of his brain.

8. Complete this sentence:

Damien's portrayal of Spike is...... exactly what it should be. Damien was brilliant as the personification of carnal man. As soon as I heard his character's name, I knew what he would be. Spike--hard, sharp, ready to pound into his target. A phallic symbol. He had to be physically fit, he had to be nearly flawless in his physicality. He had to be relentless in his insistence on his own correctness in the debate. He had to claim his position at the top of the food chain. 

But because this is Stoppard, and nothing is simple, he had to be conflicted in his belief. He had to hint that all was not well in his domain, he had to show a touch of weakness and of need. Confident enough to wear a lace dressing gown, but awkward when he tried to compliment his lover, as he believed she had complimented him. Unsure of himself in moments of intimacy. Rigid in his belief when challenged, but hesitant when there were no witnesses. Demanding his right to be right, and then wavering when presented with tears.

I loved Spike when he was least like the self he thought he needed to be. Damien's performance was perfect.

 



__________________

He'd have told me to join him, and I would. - still true!

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
Great analysis of Spike, TJ. I thought the idea of him as 'carnal man' was really interesting. Funny how everyone is struggling to find Spike's song. I wonder why that is.

You do feel a little sorry for Spike when everyone shuns him at the party after being such a drunken idiot but you kind of get the feeling he'll pick himself up and dust himself down. I agree that he's backed himself into a corner and can't get out of it without admitting that perhaps he might be wrong.

__________________
DMF
Status: Offline
Posts: 16398
Date:
Permalink  
 

Awesome to read you here TJ.. and of all the Questionnaires so far, yours is the closest to my own point of view, but I could never express it so well.
"His point of view wasn't the issue so much as his adamant refusal to consider anything else."-THIS!
" I think Spike, at some point, privately acknowledged that evolution wasn't the definitive answer. I think he looked at the excuses buttressed by flimsy research that claimed to prove man's innate selfishness, and he saw it was false. I think he felt within himself the desire to be something different and better than the product of Darwinian development, that Hillary may have stirred the longing within him to see himself as something more than a mass of cells and a bunch of synapses. I think he felt the pull of that unquantifiable part of himself, and he chose to deny it. He chose to stand by the belief that defined his profession, that paid for his rent and booze and condoms. He chose carnal man over spiritual man, and he devolved as a human being because of it. " - THIS!

and that is why the private 'was it a prayer or not' moment I brought up is so important ....

The play, to me, was allowing the possibility for both points of view, but that neither one alone was the 'answer', nor was the answer so dualistic. Said this somewhere else but I was left feeling if there was any over riding philosophy coming from the playwright it was that there is no definitive answer, but it is larger than the sum of the play's ' parts'.

Yeah...very interesting point on Spike's physicality I had not consciously thought it, but you are so right!



__________________

Fan Site | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube

 

Professional Thud-er
Status: Offline
Posts: 3589
Date:
Permalink  
 

Could we have found Spike's song? LOL

2015-07-02 00.54.png

This hit, that ice cold
Michelle Pfeiffer, that white gold
This one for them hood girls
Them good girls straight masterpieces
Stylin', whilen, livin' it up in the city
Got Chucks on with Saint Laurent
Got kiss myself, I'm so pretty

I'm too hot (hot damn)
Called a police and a fireman
I'm too hot (hot damn)
Make a dragon wanna retire man
I'm too hot (hot damn)
Say my name you know who I am
I'm too hot (hot damn)
Am I bad 'bout that money, break it down

Girls hit your hallelujah (whoo)
Girls hit your hallelujah (whoo)
Girls hit your hallelujah (whoo)
'Cause uptown funk gon' give it to you
'Cause uptown funk gon' give it to you
'Cause uptown funk gon' give it to you
Saturday night and we in the spot
Don't believe me just watch (come on)

 



__________________

papillon... pamplemousse... bibliothèque... un baiser
A lilt in his voice.  Every sentence like music...
#kisskisskiss 
A terrible beauty is born.
Love me some #Jacksass

Marvellous Molonian Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 3310
Date:
Permalink  
 
I love these little glimpses into the friendships that develop when working on a play / film / tv programme. I know that song is catchy but I'd never really thought about the dreadful lyrics - I'm too hot , make a dragon wanna retire *shakes head*

__________________
 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox

Please log in to join the chat!












Copyright 2012 - 2022 Damien Molony Forum All Rights Reserved.